Blogia
DAVIDBULLA

Free Stream Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words putlocker9 eng sub Without Registering

▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼

https://onwatchly.com/video-9849.html?utm_source=davidbulla.blogia Links Here

▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲

 

 

  • Ratings=8,6 / 10 Stars
  • writers=Michael Pack
  • Liked it=39 Vote
  • Genres=Documentary
  • description=Although Clarence Thomas remains a controversial figure, loved by some, reviled by others, few know much more than a few headlines and the recollections of his contentious confirmation battle with Anita Hill. Yet, the personal odyssey of Clarence Thomas is a classic American story and should be better known and understood. His life began in extreme poverty in the segregated South, and moved to the height of the legal profession, as one of the most influential justices on the Supreme Court. Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words tells the Clarence Thomas story truly and fully, without cover-ups or distortions. The documentary will open in movie theaters nationally on January 31, 2020, followed by a national broadcast on PBS in May 2020. Educational use is forthcoming

 

Clarence Thomas looked like and old ruthless hound dog. Thomas is a TRAITOR see for yourself go to. I feel a connection to Julian Bond and his legacy at making this country and particularly my community better for people of all kinds, especially people like myself. On the other hand, I'm extremely disappointed and feel saddened that Clarence Thomas, who has such a story to tell and has the ability to do so much for equality and justice, that he won't do so for people like myself. He won't apply stand on principle for equal justice among gay and lesbian Americans. So, that connection is lost.

This uncle tom. Free Stream Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words and pictures. He is good men. United States, 2020 Documentary Synopsis Although Clarence Thomas remains a controversial figure, loved by some, reviled by others, few know much more than a few headlines and the recollections of his contentious confirmation battle with Anita Hill. Yet, the personal odyssey of Clarence Thomas is a classic American story. This film is not currently playing on MUBI but 30 other great films are. See what’s now showing. Religion and relationship with Christ, two different things... Dont you fail to have a relationship with God (through Christ) because of the wrangles within the four walls of the church... You have no excuse. And if that is not your thing, hey, it's still fine. There's something called free will. Just keep on keeping on. No need to bring other people down because you don't agree with their beliefs...

Well its am ABSOLUTELY WORTH WATCH MOVIE. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own wordswn words. | Posted: Nov 16, 2019 12:01 AM The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of There’s a moment in the new Clarence Thomas documentary, “Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words, ” following the harrowing confirmation hearing that saw the gentle man, loving husband, and legal genius from Pin Point, Ga., accused of sexual harassment and smeared as a lecherous monster, that sticks with you long after the 2-hour film ends. It’s the look Thomas has on his face at his swearing-in ceremony. He’s not elated by the prospect of joining the Supreme Court. He looks tired and maybe more than a little concerned for his safety. And it’s an indictment of the people  — one of the most prominent in the person of then-Senator Joe Biden who came across as something of a grand inquisitor — who put Thomas through what he called at the time a “high-tech lynching for uppity blacks. ” "This is a circus. It is a national disgrace. And from my standpoint, as a black American, as far as I am concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity-blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas, and it is a message that, unless you kow-tow to an old order, this is what will happen to you, you will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U. S. Senate, rather than hung from a tree. " Filmmaker Michael Pack conducted hundreds of hours of interviews with Thomas and his wife Virginia to create this stunning documentary, which will see a wide release in May 2020 on PBS. And while it covers Thomas’ impoverished upbringing in Pin Point and later Savannah, Ga., as well as his college days as a left-wing angry social justice revolutionary, it is most moving when it covers those days of the Anita Hill allegations when Thomas’ opportunity to sit on the highest court in the land was very nearly stripped from him by allegations he still unequivocally denies. In his 2008 memoir, “My Grandfather’s Son” — a grandfather that is a looming presence over the film and, indeed, everything Thomas does — the Justice known for his quiet analysis (which he says is part of judicial philosophy that rejects the idea of judicial activism) recounts that by the end of the confirmation hearing he no longer cared about being a Supreme Court Justice. He cared only about fighting back. "I didn’t care whether I ever sat on the Supreme Court, but I wasn’t going to let what little my family and I had cobbled together to be so wantonly smashed. My enemies wanted nothing more than for me to go quietly. I, on the other hand, owed it to my family and the memory of my grandparents and forebears not to self-destruct but to confront them with the truth. " It’s a sentiment now Supreme Court Justice Bret Kavanaugh repeated at his own hearing where, he, too, was confronted with what were surely drummed up charges of sexual impropriety intended to smear him and ruin his life. “You may defeat me in the final vote, but you’ll never get me to quit, ever, ” Kavanaugh said. Which is to say the Democrats’ dirty tricks haven’t changed in 30 years.  And the real shame of it all is that, as “Created Equal” showcases, Thomas had been through more than most in order to overcome his challenges to find himself on the threshold of a SCOTUS seat. He should have been rejoicing in his achievement. Instead, as he told Pack in the film, he feels now about being on the Court exactly the same as he did when he was confirmed. “Whoop-dee-doo, ” Thomas says in the film, without a hint of a smile behind his eyes. Perhaps the ability to remain unaffected by the glamor of the position makes Thomas a better Justice. It likely does. It almost certainly keeps his attention on the cases at hand and on his own interpretation of them as a constitutional “originalist. ” But it’s a little heartbreaking that this is what the politics of personal destruction, led by liberals and progressives, do to the good men of this country. Fortunately, there’s much more to Thomas’ story, happier anecdotes about meeting his wife and making his grandfather proud, that shine through in Pack’s film.  But that look on his face at his swearing-in ceremony stays with you long after the film ends. Sarah Lee is a freelance writer and policy wonk living and working in Washington, DC.

Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words video. Legendary Justice. Free Stream Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words of wisdom. It's sad that we're back to this exact same point now. ੳਸਾਤੁਕਲਿਵ. Clarence Thomas is my hero. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words quotes. Free Stream Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words to eat. ConservativeHQ shared a link. 14 hrs Anyone with eyes and experience knows Joe Biden’s campaign is in trouble and may be on unalterable death watch. But it’s still too early to say for sure whether the former Obama veep is comatose and headed for political obscurity. Nevada and South Carolina will have their say. Will Biden spring... Assault on America, Day 411: Time to stick a fork in Joe Biden’s comatose candidacy…or is it? Anyone with eyes and experience knows Joe Biden’s campaign is in trouble and may be on unalterable death watch. Anyone with eyes and experience knows Joe Biden’s campaign is in trouble and may be on unalterable death watch. 14 hrs There Will Be No ‘Peace’ In Afghanistan President Trump is to be commended for his desire to bring our troops home, but he, and more importantly, the generals and diplomats who have been conducting the war since 2001 are fooling themselves if they think this arrangement – or any arrangement with the Taliban – will truly end the war. H... President Trump is to be commended for his desire to bring our troops home, but he, and more importantly, the generals and diplomats who have been conducting the war since 2001 are fooling themselves if they think this arrangement – or any arrangement with the Taliban – will truly end the war. February 15 at 10:11 AM Serious and credible questions, including the seating of a tainted jury, have been raised about the government’s motives and conduct of the investigation and prosecution of Roger Stone. The vehemence by which the Mueller prosecutors continue to pursue Stone belies any claims of fairness and due pr... President Trump: End The Persecution Of Roger Stone With An Immediate Pardon Serious and credible questions, including the seating of a tainted jury, have been raised about the government’s motives and conduct of the investigation and prosecution of Roger Stone. Serious and credible questions, including the seating of a tainted jury, have been raised about the government’s motives and conduct of the investigation and prosecution of Roger Stone. February 14 at 3:54 AM Bloomberg has already tripled Trump’s 2016 spending, with no end in sight. Bloomberg has said he’s open to spending $1 billion dollars of his own money in his bid to become president, but whether he and Tom Steyer can use their billions to buy or use legal forms of bribery to build a loyal and e... Billionaires Buying Or Bribing Their Way To Democrat Nomination? Bloomberg has already tripled Trump’s 2016 spending, with no end in sight. Bloomberg has already tripled Trump’s 2016 spending, with no end in sight. February 14 at 3:48 AM No matter how hard they try, Democrats will have a heck of a time convincing Americans that the economy isn’t working for them and that the only solution to their woes is to turn Trump out of office. Telling someone to see something that isn’t there isn’t exactly a sound strategy for success. Assault on America, Day 408: The American economy stinks? According to Democrats it does No matter how hard they try, Democrats will have a heck of a time convincing Americans that the economy isn’t working for them and that the only solution to their woes is to turn Trump out of office. No matter how hard they try, Democrats will have a heck of a time convincing Americans that the economy isn’t working for them and that the only solution to their woes is to turn Trump out of office. February 14 at 3:46 AM The toll-free Capitol Switchboard number (1-866-220-0044), we urge CHQ readers and friends to call Senators Tillis, Graham and Lankford to demand that they get off this Democrat-inspired amnesty for illegal aliens bill. GOP Joining Democrat Illegal Alien Amnesty Through New Farm Bill The toll-free Capitol Switchboard number (1-866-220-0044), we urge CHQ readers and friends to call Senators Tillis, Graham and Lankford to demand that they get off this Democrat-inspired amnesty for illegal aliens bill. The toll-free Capitol Switchboard number (1-866-220-0044), we urge CHQ readers and friends to call Senators Tillis, Graham and Lankford to demand that they get off this Democrat-inspired amnesty for illegal aliens bill. February 13 at 4:10 AM Amy Klobuchar had minimal national name recognition before this presidential race. The odds of her defeating Biden, Sanders, and Warren seemed overwhelmingly against her. Yet she persisted. And now she has enough of a demonstrated following to make her the logical vice presidential choice of either.... Amy Klobuchar Wins the Democrats’ Vice Presidential Nomination Amy Klobuchar had minimal national name recognition before this presidential race. Amy Klobuchar had minimal national name recognition before this presidential race. February 13 at 4:09 AM Logic says Democrats’ dissatisfaction with their presidential field will continue until party voters settle on a frontrunner, but that’s not likely to happen as long as the candidates are as divided as they are now. With no “White Knight” on the horizon, the party’s hopelessness will only... Assault on America, Day 407: Search for Dem White Knight becomes forlorn recovery mission Logic says Democrats’ dissatisfaction with their presidential field will continue until party voters settle on a frontrunner, but that’s not likely to happen as long as the candidates are as divided as they are now. Logic says Democrats’ dissatisfaction with their presidential field will continue until party voters settle on a frontrunner, but that’s not likely to happen as long as the candidates are as divided as they are now. February 13 at 4:02 AM FLASH: President Trump has withdrawn the nomination of Jessie Liu who was scheduled for her confirmation hearing on Thursday at 10:00am. Ms. Liu will be under oath. If any Senator on that committee is brave enough to ask our tough questions it is Senator Tom Cotton. We urge CHQ readers and friends t... FLASH: Trump Withdraws Jessie Liu Nomination FLASH: President Trump has withdrawn the nomination of Jessie Liu who was scheduled for her confirmation hearing on Thursday at 10:00am. FLASH: President Trump has withdrawn the nomination of Jessie Liu who was scheduled for her confirmation hearing on Thursday at 10:00am. February 12 at 4:05 AM What a mess. The New Hampshire Democrat primary went absolutely as predicted. Sanders comes away with the undisputed win he was deprived of in Iowa and the “moderates” are left wondering what a Bernie-bro fueled fall candidacy might look like. Donald Trump won the day without even being on the b... Assault on America, Day 406: NH greases Bernie’s socialist wheel, establishment fumes What a mess. What a mess. February 12 at 4:04 AM Madison Moore’s question was a perfectly legitimate reality-based question, which Biden deflected with an insult rather than answering. We’re All Dog-Faced Pony Soldiers Now Madison Moore’s question was a perfectly legitimate reality-based question, which Biden deflected with an insult rather than answering. Madison Moore’s question was a perfectly legitimate reality-based question, which Biden deflected with an insult rather than answering. February 11 at 3:39 AM Conservatives Must Stop the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPV) Conservatives must defend the Electoral College as a bulwark of constitutional federalism and republican governance. “Checks and balances” have not gone out of date. Neither have limits on majority power. Conservatives must defend the Electoral College as a bulwark of constitutional federalism and republican governance. February 11 at 3:37 AM It's no secret that Washington is chock full of liars, sleazebags and opportunists, but what Mitt Romney did last week ranks up there with the most underhanded, publicity seeking stunts of all time. President Trump will succeed despite the presence of people like Romney. Who will history remember? Assault on America, Day 405: Romney, Hogg, and all of DC’s liars, sleazebags and opportunists It's no secret that Washington is chock full of liars, sleazebags and opportunists, but what Mitt Romney did last week ranks up there with the most underhanded, publicity seeking stunts of all time. Who will history remember? It's no secret that Washington is chock full of liars, sleazebags and opportunists, but what Mitt Romney did last week ranks up there with the most underhanded, publicity seeking stunts of all time. Who will history remember? ConservativeHQ shared a link. February 11 at 3:31 AM By holding his platform "close to his chest, " Buttigieg and his handlers hope he can fake out enough people who don’t support radical ideas, such unlimited abortion up to and past the moment of birth, to get elected and proceed to implement the ideas he supposedly wasn’t for. Pete Buttigieg Is No ‘Moderate’ On Abortion By holding his platform "close to his chest, " Buttigieg and his handlers hope he can fake out enough people who don’t support radical ideas, such unlimited abortion up to and past the moment of birth, to get elected and proceed to implement the ideas he supposedly wasn’t for. By holding his platform "close to his chest, " Buttigieg and his handlers hope he can fake out enough people who don’t support radical ideas, such unlimited abortion up to and past the moment of birth, to get elected and proceed to implement the ideas he supposedly wasn’t for. February 9 at 5:18 PM Washington Post reporter Henry Olsen accuses the authors of the groundbreaking book "Coming Home" of using “cherry-picked evidence” to predict a surge in African American support for President Trump. In fact, he is the one guilty of cherry picking data even slanting the data. Don’t Tell Henry Olsen, But He Sounds Like the Republicans of the 1930’s Washington Post reporter Henry Olsen accuses the authors of the groundbreaking book "Coming Home" of using “cherry-picked evidence” to predict a surge in African American support for President Trump. Washington Post reporter Henry Olsen accuses the authors of the groundbreaking book "Coming Home" of using “cherry-picked evidence” to predict a surge in African American support for President Trump. February 9 at 5:03 PM Impeachment will likely end up killing Biden’s final run for president, but there wasn’t much of a foundation for his candidacy to begin with. All along Joe chose to defend his son against some pretty obvious charges of political favoritism. It’s a choice he made… and the man chose his famil... Assault on America, Day 404: Biden’s facade candidacy implodes from lack of real substance Impeachment will likely end up killing Biden’s final run for president, but there wasn’t much of a foundation for his candidacy to begin with. Impeachment will likely end up killing Biden’s final run for president, but there wasn’t much of a foundation for his candidacy to begin with. February 9 at 4:55 PM New Hampshire Democrats head to the polls in a few days and they’ll need to decide between the emerging party socialistic trend -- as embodied by Bernie Sanders -- and the establishment status quo (Joe Biden? ). Pete Buttigieg is a possible alternative to Biden, but he didn’t inspire much confide... Assault on America, Day 402: Democrat NH debate -- Anger and Racism ain’t gonna do it New Hampshire Democrats head to the polls in a few days and they’ll need to decide between the emerging party socialistic trend -- as embodied by Bernie Sanders -- and the establishment status quo (Joe Biden? ). New Hampshire Democrats head to the polls in a few days and they’ll need to decide between the emerging party socialistic trend -- as embodied by Bernie Sanders -- and the establishment status quo (Joe Biden? ). February 8 at 5:14 AM While we agree with the President that Democrats are both vicious and mean, we want to focus on what the President said about the Republicans and conservatives who were the leaders of the effort to save the Trump presidency and the MAGA agenda. Trump Recognizes His Congressional Defense Team In Well-Deserved Victory Lap While we agree with the President that Democrats are both vicious and mean, we want to focus on what the President said about the Republicans and conservatives who were the leaders of the effort to save the Trump presidency and the MAGA agenda. While we agree with the President that Democrats are both vicious and mean, we want to focus on what the President said about the Republicans and conservatives who were the leaders of the effort to save the Trump presidency and the MAGA agenda. February 7 at 4:11 AM The Institute for Free Speech will be before the IRS this morning fighting for donor privacy and to help ensure that venal Democrats, such as former California Attorney General Kamal Harris, cannot weaponize nonprofit donor disclosures against political opponents. Trump Administration Moves To Protect Donor Privacy The Institute for Free Speech will be before the IRS this morning fighting for donor privacy and to help ensure that venal Democrats, such as former California Attorney General Kamal Harris, cannot weaponize nonprofit donor disclosures against political opponents. The Institute for Free Speech will be before the IRS this morning fighting for donor privacy and to help ensure that venal Democrats, such as former California Attorney General Kamal Harris, cannot weaponize nonprofit donor disclosures against political opponents. See More.

Define Created equal, theologically; NOT according to our temporal shifting-sands of contemporary social-convention. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words pdf. Anita Hill was a victim and they just humiliated her.😡😡. And black Americans keep trusting the dems. Unbelievable. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words worksheet. Free stream created equal clarence thomas in his own words. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words movie.

Make MSN my home page Click Save File in the pop-up window. Click the arrow button in the top upper corner of your browser. Click to run the downloaded file. If prompted, click Run. By clicking to run this downloaded file you agree to the Microsoft Service Agreement and Privacy Statement. Installation applies to Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari. Download didn't start? Try again. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words youtube. And he's proven to be such a seriously intellectual lightweight. It's been over 20 years, and Clarence Thomas hasn't written an opinion yet. He's there just to ditto the rest of the conservatives on this most terrible of courts, and use his stature as a justice to open doors his wife. How long will we put up with this moron taking up a perfectly good seat on the Supreme Court.

At 17:45 Clarence Thomass testimony begins


Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words list.
OMG, here because of Kavanaugh, this is incredible.
Different time same song and dance from the democrats.

Story highlights High court's lone African-American justice ruled against civil rights pillar Conservative majority's decision strikes at heart of 1965 Voting Rights Act Questions about Clarence Thomas persist even after two decades on the Supreme Court Among them: Why does he condemn affirmative action if he benefited from it? He wore a black beret and Army fatigues, warned people that a revolution was coming and memorized the speeches of Malcolm X. "I now believed that the whole of American culture was irretrievably tainted by racism, " he once said, describing his reaction to the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. On Tuesday, that same man helped dismantle a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, one of the pillars of the civil rights movement. If he had his way, he would bury another pillar: affirmative action. There may seem to be a contradiction between the Clarence Thomas who was the angry campus radical in the 1960s and the conservative hero who sits on the U. S. Supreme Court today. But some legal observers say Thomas sees himself as a "prophetic civil rights leader" who is still fighting for the same cause -- a colorblind America. "A lot of people who are what I call professional Negros have ridden white guilt and socialism to very lucrative lives, " says Holzer, who uses the term "Negro" because he says he doesn't classify people by skin color. "Thomas didn't, " Holzer says. "He made a very deliberate and gutsy decision to go where his intellect and his study took him, and that's heroic. " One man's hero, though, is another man's sellout. During his nearly 22 years on the nation's highest court, Thomas has been called a self-loathing "Uncle Thomas. " His impact, though, cannot be ignored. His judicial opinions have transformed America. And no other contemporary Supreme Court justice has spoken with such raw emotion about race or has embodied the subject's complexities. Yet he is still a mystery to many. There are questions about Thomas that have persisted even after two decades on the Supreme Court as its lone African-American justice. Here are three of them: Question 1: Why does Thomas condemn affirmative action if he benefited from it? On Monday, the Supreme Court sidestepped a sweeping decisio n on the use of race in college admissions, throwing a Texas case back to the lower courts for further review. The high court had been asked to decide if the University of Texas violated the constitutional rights of some white applicants by considering race in the admissions process. Thomas, in issuing a concurring opinion with the 7-1 majority, left no doubt as to how he would have ruled had the court not found that lower federal courts failed to apply the appropriate standards in the Texas case. "Just as the alleged educational benefits of segregation were insufficient to justify racial discrimination then, " Thomas wrote, "the alleged educational benefits of diversity cannot justify racial discrimination today. " "The university's professed good intentions cannot excuse its outright racial discrimination any more than such intentions justified the now denounced arguments of slaveholders and segregationists. " Thomas has consistently voted against affirmative action policies because he says they're divisive, unconstitutional and harmful to their recipients. He cites his own experience as an example. Thomas was born in poverty in rural Georgia but managed to gain admittance to Yale Law School. He acknowledges that he made it to Yale because of affirmative action but says the stigma of preferential treatment made it difficult for him to find a job after college. In his memoir, "My Grandfather's Son, " Thomas says he felt "tricked" by paternalistic whites at Yale who recruited black students. "I was bitter toward the white bigots whom I held responsible for the unjust treatment of blacks, " he wrote, "but even more bitter toward those ostensibly unprejudiced whites who pretended to side with black people while using them to further their own political and social ends. " Some observers, though, counter with one question: If affirmative action is so bad for its recipients, how come you've done so well? "His entire judicial philosophy is at war with his own biography, " said Michael Fletcher, co-author of "Supreme Discomfort: The Divided Soul of Clarence Thomas. " "He's arguably benefited from affirmative action every step of the way. " For many blacks, affirmative action is "the contemporary equivalent of the Emancipation Proclamation, " Fletcher explains in his book. It's one of the most important legacies of the civil rights movement. The expansion of the black middle class was driven by affirmative action policies, he says. Some blacks detest Thomas not because he's conservative, Fletcher says, but because he rules against affirmative action policies, closing the door that was opened for him. The black community has accepted conservatives as varied as Booker T. Washington, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice. Many members of the community dislike Thomas for another reason. "Some say he's a traitor and hypocritical, " says Fletcher, an economics correspondent with The Washington Post. Thomas first attracted public attention in the early 1980s when President Ronald Reagan asked him to lead the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which enforces federal discrimination laws. Thomas' opposition to affirmative action and criticisms of civil rights leaders during his tenure made headlines. In 1990, President George H. W. Bush appointed Thomas to the powerful U. Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit, a traditional steppingstone to the Supreme Court. Would Thomas have risen so far so quickly had he not been black? CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin doesn't think so. In a biting 2007 New Yorker magazine review of Thomas' memoir, Toobin wrote that Thomas had never tried a case or argued an appeal in any federal court and had never produced any scholarly work when he made the D. appeals court. "Yale and Reagan treated him the same way, but he hates one and reveres the other, " Toobin wrote. "Thomas never acknowledges, much less explains, the contradiction. " When Bush selected Thomas in 1991 to replace Thurgood Marshall, the court's first black justice, the questions about Thomas' qualifications intensified. Bush said he picked "the best qualified" nominee, but Thomas questioned that in his memoir, saying even he had doubts about Bush's "extravagant" claim. "There was no way I could really know what the president and his aides had been thinking when they picked me, " he wrote. Thomas' defenders say his performance on the high court has removed any doubts about his qualifications. They call him the most consistent conservative on the court, a man who won't sacrifice his principles to eke out a short-term judicial victory. Holzer, author of "The Supreme Court Opinions of Clarence Thomas, " says he doesn't think Thomas "benefited from affirmative action at all. " Thomas' legal acumen is well-known, says Holzer, a retired law professor from Brooklyn Law School. Thomas is the court's leading "originalist" -- he says he interprets the Constitution based on what the framers meant, not on any partisan policy preferences. "This may be hard for Toobin to swallow -- Clarence Thomas would have been appointed were he white, yellow, brown, beige, even blue or green. " Scott Douglas Gerber, an Ohio Northern University law professor and author of "First Principles: The Jurisprudence of Clarence Thomas, " says Thomas is on the verge of cementing his judicial legacy with the civil rights cases before the court. Thomas' constitutional philosophy is simple, Gerber says: All Americans should be treated as individuals and not as members of a racial or ethnic group. Gerber says Thomas has ruled against the Voting Rights Act in the past because he believes that laws based on the "proportional allocation of political powers according to race" should be overturned. The Voting Rights Act is considered one of the crown jewels of the civil rights movement. Its passage, which came about after King led a dramatic campaign in Selma, Alabama, is responsible for the expansion of black political power in the last 30 years. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court's conservative majority issued a ruling that essentially strikes at the heart of the Voting Rights Act. The court voted 5-4 to limit the use of a key provision in the landmark law, in effect invalidating federal enforcement over all or parts of 15 states with a past history of voter discrimination. Thomas isn't the only Supreme Court justice whose life has been shaped by affirmative action. One of his colleagues is grateful for the role it played in her life. Sonia Sotomayor told "60 Minutes" that affirmative action helped her gain admittance to Princeton University. (She also graduated from Yale Law School. ) She is the first Hispanic justice on the Supreme Court. "It was a door-opener that changed the course of my life, " Sotomayor said in the January interview. Question 2: How does Thomas embrace an "originalist" view of the Constitution when the framers would have considered him a slave? A lot of originalist judges rhapsodize about the wisdom of the Constitution's framers, but Thomas approaches the Constitution with a different racial history. Blacks were enslaved by many of the founding fathers who talked about liberty and freedom. How does a black judge become an originalist when the "original intent" of the Constitution was to preserve slavery and classify slaves as three-fifths of a human being? Thomas addressed that question in part in one of his most cited opinions, a 2007 school integration case, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1. Thomas joined a conservative majority that ruled 5-4 that race cannot be a factor in assigning children to public schools. In a concurring opinion, Thomas cited one of the Supreme Court's greatest judges, John Marshall Harlan, known as the "great dissenter. " Harlan issued a thunderous dissent in the notorious 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case, which sanctioned the separate but equal doctrine that provided the legal foundation for the brutal Jim Crow era. Plessy is considered one of the high court's lowest moments. Thomas invoked another landmark Supreme Court decision, the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education ruling, which declared segregated schools and the separate-but-equal doctrine of Plessy unconstitutional. Thomas wrote in the Seattle decision: "My view of the Constitution is Justice Harlan's view in Plessy: 'Our Constitution is colorblind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. ' And my view was the rallying cry for the lawyers who litigated Brown. " Thomas embraces an originalism that is rooted in the principles of the founders rather than their practices, wrote Hannah L. Weiner, author of an article in the Duke Law Journal on Thomas titled "The Next Great Dissenter. " Weiner said Thomas believes that history will hail him as a "prophetic leader of civil rights" who honored the civil rights movement by fighting for its ultimate goal: a colorblind America. "He says the same framers who saw him as three-fifths of a man wrote the Declaration of Independence that allowed us to dream of having a President Obama in the White House, " says the Post's Fletcher. Marcia Coyle, author of the "The Roberts Court, " a look at the contemporary court's battle over the Constitution, says Thomas believes that Reconstruction -- a brief period after the Civil War when the federal government strove to make full citizens of freed slaves -- purified the Constitution. "He believes the Reconstruction amendments purged the Constitution of the taint of slavery and rendered the Constitution colorblind, " says Coyle, who provides Supreme Court analysis for the "PBS NewsHour. " The Reconstruction amendments are the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments. They abolish slavery, empower newly freed slaves and protect their right to vote. For anyone who follows matters of race in America, the 14th Amendment is vital. The amendment, with its emphasis on equality, has become the epicenter of a fierce legal battle over what the Constitution says about race. Thomas and other conservative judges believe the 14th Amendment bans any preferential treatment of minorities because the Constitution is colorblind. It doesn't matter if a person is white, black or green, they say, dividing people up by race is unconstitutional. They cite Harlan's "colorblind" dissent in Plessy in which he invoked the 14th Amendment. Others say judges such as Thomas are engaging in clever semantics, commandeering language that was originally used to help racial minorities to argue for policies that now exclude them. Doug Kendall, founder and president of the Constitutional Accountability Center in Washington, says Thomas is a "faux" originalist who ignores the "original intent" of the 14th Amendment framers who were trying to create laws to address the legacy of slavery. "They were the first proponents of affirmative action, " Kendall says of the Reconstruction amendment lawmakers. "They passed a whole series of laws that were designed to help the freed slaves realize the promise of being a full and equal citizen in the U. " But Gerber, the Ohio Northern University law professor, says Thomas bases his originalist vision in the Declaration of Independence. "He knows that most of the framers were racists, " says Gerber. "He rejects those personal practices but as (Abraham) Lincoln pointed out, the framers committed the nation to the idea of equality that is articulated in the Declaration. " Question 3: Why doesn't Thomas follow his own advice about not playing the victim? When he worked for the Reagan administration, Thomas once told a reporter that all civil rights leaders did was "bitch, bitch, bitch, moan and moan, whine and whine. " Thomas has long preached that blacks should be self-reliant and stop complaining about racism. He traces that philosophy to his childhood in Georgia, where he was raised by a stern grandfather who told him he had to "play the hand" fate dealt him. "I'd long believed that the best thing to do was to stop government-sanctioned segregation, then concentrate on education and equal employment opportunities, " he wrote in his memoir. "The rest I thought would take care of itself. " Yet critics say Thomas doesn't follow his own advice. They say he regularly portrays himself as a victim even though he sits on the nation's highest court. Fletcher called him "the most successful victim in America. " He says Thomas holds grudges against old college classmates, black critics and "elites. " He often equates his plight to that of slaves when he compares critics to "overseers" and talks about blacks who expect him to be an "intellectual slave. " "He has a lot of slights that he catalogs carefully throughout his life, " Fletcher says. Slights against the U. Supreme Court also affect Thomas. While speaking to a bar association in Georgia in 2011, Thomas said critics of the Supreme Court's decisions were illiterate or lazy. "You don't just keep nagging and nagging and nagging, " he told the Augusta Bar Association. "Sometimes, too much is too much. " Thomas recently used an occasion of great joy for the black community -- the election of the nation's first black president -- to complain about persecution. When he was asked if he was surprised that a black man became president, he criticized the "elites" and "the media. " "The thing that I always knew is that it would have to be a black president who was approved by the elites and the media, because anybody they didn't agree with, they would take apart, " Thomas said during a C-SPAN interview at a Pittsburgh law school in April. Thomas' behavior at his confirmation hearing in 1991 soured some critics as well. When he was accused of sexual harassment, Thomas publicly told a Senate panel that he was the victim of a "high-tech lynching" reserved for uppity blacks. Thomas flashed the race card to get on the Supreme Court, says George Curry, a commentator, media coach and speaker who once placed Thomas on the cover of a now-defunct black political magazine called Emerge with the title, "Uncle Thomas. " "He used race when it was convenient to him, " Curry says. "That was designed to put an all-white panel on the defensive. " Thomas, though, says it's not persecution if it's real. In his memoir, he wrote about his confirmation hearing: "As a child in the Deep South, I'd grown up fearing the lynch mobs of the Ku Klux Klan; as an adult, I was starting to wonder if I'd been afraid of the wrong white people all along. My worst fears had come to pass not in Georgia but in Washington, D. C., where I was being pursued not by bigots in white robes but by left-wing zealots draped in flowing sanctimony. " Horace Cooper, an attorney and commentator, says Thomas was only telling the truth when he invoked a "high-tech lynching. " He says many people haven't accepted that Thomas isn't the liberal crusader they think the successor to Marshall, the court's first black justice, should be. "The law isn't about helping oppressed and downtrodden people get justice in a system tilted against them, " says Cooper, whose columns appear on, a conservative online magazine. "Justice Thomas has been reminding people that it is not the role of the court to undo unfairness but to literally use the rules: Call a strike a strike and a foul a foul. " Thomas' pugnacious public image doesn't jibe with his personality, others say. He is the warmest and most accessible Supreme Court justice, they say, a man with a booming laugh who mentors young people. In a 1998 address to a group of predominantly African-American lawyers, Thomas showed a more vulnerable side. "It pains me deeply -- more deeply than any of you can imagine -- to be perceived by so many members of my race as doing them harm, " he told the National Bar Association, the nation's largest group of lawyers, during a meeting in Memphis, Tennessee. "All the sacrifice, all the long hours of preparation were to help, not to hurt, " he said. "I have come here today not in anger or to anger. " Thomas' speech was greeted with scattered boos and little applause, news reports say. Thomas' latest decisions may receive the same hostile reaction from his own community. But that won't stop Thomas from issuing his fiery opinions on race, in court and out of it, some say. "It seems as if he's accepted the fact that he's out there alone and he's writing for the future, not today, " says Coyle, author of "The Roberts Court. " The goals of that future aren't that much different from those of the past, Thomas suggests in his memoir. At the end of his book, Thomas wrote that he was visited by Marshall, now considered a civil rights icon, in 1991 shortly after Thomas was confirmed to the court. Thomas tells him he would have marched with civil rights demonstrators if he had the courage. "I did in my time what I had to, " Thomas says Marshall told him. "You have to do in your time what you have to do. " Whether people agree with Thomas or not, one thing is apparent from the direction of this Supreme Court: Thomas is not so alone anymore. This is his time.

Free Stream Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words to say. Tuesday, February 11, 2020 Details RESERVE YOUR SEATS RIGHT HERE: A superb documentary delivers a measure of justice to an extraordinary justice. Among the most prominent figures in American politics, perhaps none is as poorly understood as Justice Clarence Thomas. Watching him tell his riveting story at length on camera for the first time, it becomes evident that the man has been deeply wronged — maligned, disparaged, written off. Thomas may be the most famously silent public figure since Calvin Coolidge. But he has much to say in Michael Pack’s excellent documentary Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words, a measure of long-delayed redress for Thomas’s reputation. Should Thomas remain on the high court until his 80th birthday, as has become common, he would become the longest-serving justice in U. S. history. May he have that last laugh.

Anita Hill should/could have been on the Supreme Court. If Thomas had not sexually harassed her she may have stayed on, had an illustrious career in law and on the bench and we could have been talking about confirming her. In all the discussion about destroying men, the loss and shattered dreams of women is never mourned. Maybe if Louis CK hadnt exposed himself and blackballed female comics, they would be walking into their standing ovations at the comedy cellar too.

Easily one of the finest intellects in American history. Anita Hill's accusations have been discredited multiple times. It was one big lie. I can point back to his autobiography, My Grandfather's Son, as an important point in my world view. I have a high admiration for CT and have given the book to two young men, one black, one white (my son) and am taking my other son to see the move today. I am thrilled to drive the 50 minutes one way to see this and support it. Free Stream Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words without. Some men get more good looking with age. Joe Biden is one of those men. It's amazing how history literally repeats itself. Have we learned nothing.

Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words images. An impressive statement from an equally impressive man. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words meaning. Free Stream Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words of love. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words full.

Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words book. 10/4/18. Judge Thomas is from my state- GA. Best thing was that he couldn't get a good job offer & was forced to go where somebody wanted to hire him & he became a member of the Supreme Court! God works in mysterious ways. Justice Clarence Thomas is a good man - and this was so painful to watch. He held himself with such dignity in the presence of his enemies. My favorite Justice. Lots of Klansmen commenting today... Free Stream Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own wordstream. I have much respect for Justice Clearance Thomas. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words first.


导演: Michael Pack 编剧: Michael Pack 类型: 纪录片 制片国家/地区: 美国 语言: 英语 上映日期: 2020-01-31(美国) 片长: 116分钟 IMDb链接: tt10256238 0 有用 [Deleted] 看过 2020-02-05 RBG的对立版本,具有类似的身份,却是对立的性别、肤色、甚至形象,可以观察如Clarence Thomas之寡言,影片中他却用极为清晰的表述回忆自祖父起黑人权利与个人的发展,政治立场的意味远高于个人的职业 你关注的人还没写过短评 Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words的话题 · · · · · · ( 全部 条) 什么是话题 无论是一部作品、一个人,还是一件事,都往往可以衍生出许多不同的话题。将这些话题细分出来,分别进行讨论,会有更多收获。 我要写影评 Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words的影评 · · · · · · ( 全部 0 条) 豆瓣成员常用的标签 · · · · · · 以下豆列推荐 ( 全部) 订阅Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words的评论: feed: rss 2. 0.
Free Stream Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words on the page.

Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words pictures. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words lyrics. I loved this interview. Clarence is the best of the best and one who was also very mistreated by the Democrats during his confirmation hearing. Democrats is the party of racism and hypocrisy. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words 2017. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words free. Free stream created equal: clarence thomas in his own words online. Clarence Thomas, arguably the most conservative justice on the U. S. Supreme Court, may be known for his silence on the bench during oral arguments, but now he’s speaking out. In an upcoming documentary, “Created Equal: Clarence Thomas In His Own Words, ” Thomas describes his faith, his political awakening, his judicial philosophy, and the role race has played in his life, offering viewers rare insight into the mind of a justice known for his reticence on the public stage. “‘This is the wrong black guy, he has to be destroyed, '” Thomas says at one point in the film, characterizing those who opposed his nomination to the Supreme Court nomination in 1991. “Just say it. And now at least we’re honest with each other. ” Remembering the moment that Anita Hill’s allegations that he had sexually harassed her were made public, Thomas says, that’s when “all heck broke loose. ” The new documentary, which TIME saw in an intimate advance screening, will be released in 2020 and set to air on PBS in May. It was made by Manifold Productions, which is led by Michael Pack, a conservative filmmaker who has worked with Steve Bannon. President Donald Trump nominated Pack to be the head of the Broadcasting Board of Governors. The film is largely sympathetic to Thomas. On its website, Manifold Productions says the purpose of the movie is to “tell the Clarence Thomas story truly and fully, without cover-ups or distortions. ” Thomas and his wife Virginia are the only people whose interviews appear in the film. (Other voices, including Hill’s, are included in old footage. ) Pack interviewed Thomas for more than 30 hours over a six month period. Speaking after a screening on Oct. 22, he said he worried that including other original interviews would cause him to “lose Justice Thomas’s voice. ” “I felt it would also let viewers make up their own mind, ” Pack says. “My deal with the audience was to let Justice Thomas tell his story and be fair to his story. ” Much of the film addresses the justice’s upbringing, which brought him from poverty in rural Georgia to the highest court in the land, and tracks his personal and political transitions along the way. Get our Politics Newsletter. Sign up to receive the day's most important political stories from Washington and beyond. Thank you! For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder. But a significant section of the movie also revisits Thomas’s contentious confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which was at the time overseen by then-Delaware Senator Joe Biden, who is now running for president. “One of the things you do in hearings is you have to sit there and look attentively at people you know have no idea what they’re talking about, ” Thomas says, in reference to a line of questioning from Biden. “Most of my opponents on the Judiciary Committee cared about only one thing: how would I rule on abortion rights? ” Thomas says. “You really didn’t matter, and your life didn’t matter. What mattered was what they wanted. And what they wanted was this particular issue. ” Since joining the Supreme Court, Thomas has voted repeatedly to roll back abortion rights and has urged the court to reconsider Roe v. Wade and other landmark abortion cases. “Our abortion jurisprudence has spiraled out of control, ” he wrote in 2019. It was after the first round of hearings during which Democratic senators pressed him on his judicial philosophy and abortion that Hill testified that Thomas had sexually harassed her at work. Thomas unequivocally denied each of her allegations then—and he does so again in the documentary. In the film, he recalls feeling “deflated” when the FBI first came to his house and asked him about Hill’s allegations, and describes the ensuing media onslaught as him being “literally under siege. ” “Oh God, no, ” Thomas says when Pack asks him whether he watched Hill’s testimony. Thomas says his experience in the hearings made him realize that he had been expecting a certain type of person—as he described them, the ‘bigot, Klansman, and rural sheriff’—to hold him back over the course of his life. But the confirmation hearing changed his mind. “It turned out that through all of that, ultimately the biggest impediment was the modern day liberal, ” he says. Thomas says he was in the bathtub when the Senate voted on October 15, 1991 to confirm him to the Supreme Court. “My reaction is still pretty much the way it is now, ” Thomas says. “I mean, whoop-dee-damn-doo. I wasn’t really all that interested in it. ” “The idea was to get rid of me, ” Thomas says, describing attempts to derail his nomination. “And then after I was there, it was to undermine me. ” Pack says his on-camera interviews with Thomas ended before Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing in September 2018 when Christine Blasey Ford accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault. But Pack says Thomas had declined to wade into questions about the #MeToo movement over the course of their interviews. Thomas also speaks about the difficulty he says he has experienced being a prominent black conservative. “There’s different sets of rules for different people, ” Thomas says. “If you criticize a black person who’s more liberal, you’re a racist. Whereas you can do whatever to me, or to now [HUD Secretary] Ben Carson, and that’s fine, because you’re not really black because you’re not doing what we expect black people to do. ” Thomas speaks in the film about some of the pillars of his life, including his grandfather who raised him, his religion, and his belief in the principles of the Constitution. He also talks about his judicial philosophy, and why he almost never asks a single question during oral arguments. “We are judges, not advocates, ” Thomas says. “The referee in the game should not be a participant in the game. ” At a low moment in his life, before he becomes a judge, Thomas says he had a reckoning with his purpose and his values. “For what will you die? ” he remembers asking himself. “Is there something in life you would die for? What about your principles? ” Thomas says he decided then that the principles his grandfather raised him with and the principles of this country were worth dying for—and those would shape how he lived. Write to Tessa Berenson at.

President George Bush nominated Clarence Thomas for the Supreme Court to replace Thurgood Marshall, who had retired but those racist whites on Capitol Hill did not want another black judge replacing a black judge. so they concocted a despicable lie about Clarence Thomas.

  1. Reporter: Amazing Adornments
  2. Resume: We buy and sell vintage and contemporary costume jewelry. Use coupon: TWCUST11 at checkout for 10% discount.

 

0 comentarios